A courting couple, a lonely field, a gunman
Sixty years ago a small time thief with no history of violent crime was hanged for a motiveless and horrific crime, but vital evidence withheld from the original trial, suggested that he may have been wrongly executed.
At the same time new DNA discoveries told a very different story.
What is the truth in this case?
Was he innocent or guilty?
Is the DNA evidence a cover up for the British government?
What is your opinion after reading this book?